«« »»

Stephen O’Malley: But remember what you have had

More reviews by
Artist: Stephen O’Malley (@)
Title: But remember what you have had
Format: LP
Label: Portraits GRM (@)
Rated: * * * * *
Let us begin with a question. What happens when the godfather of drone, a man who once turned guitars into cathedrals of doom, decides to paint with silence, breath, and resonance? You get "But remember what you have had" - a title as elegiac as it is cautionary, as if whispered by a ghost too proud to haunt.

Stephen O’Malley has long been the high priest of the slow burn. His work with SUNN O))) was a lesson in monumental minimalism, a parade of distorted tectonic plates in slow motion. But here, he exchanges the molten heaviness for something more translucent, more disquieting in its restraint. This is not a turning point - it’s a re-tuning. A spectral realignment. Like watching a thunderstorm through noise-cancelling headphones.

Recorded between Paris and Seattle, between prehistoric caves and modernist studios, the album is a fusion of discipline and delirium. O’Malley's electric guitars still play a role, but no longer as monolithic sermonizers. They shimmer, stretch, crackle like embers in a vacuum. Winds - bass flute, bass clarinet, trumpet, trombone - thread their way through the piece like ancient messages carried on the backs of glacial winds. If this sounds overly poetic, it's because the music forces your brain to think in fog and metaphor.

Kali Malone’s subtle influence is here too - not front and center, but as a conductor of flow, a quiet architect in the background who helps shape O’Malley’s tendencies toward sonic enormity into something that feels, paradoxically, both vast and meticulous. And yes, François Bonnet and the hallowed GRM studios are involved - so you know you're not in the land of verse-chorus-verse anymore. You're floating somewhere between acousmatic devotion and post-human melancholy, where the source is always ambiguous and the result is a slow dissolution of what you thought music meant.

There are only two sides, two long-form pieces, and yet time here seems to stretch in unfamiliar ways. Side A hums and swells with the menace of something barely repressed; Side B exhales more deeply, unfolding like a processional for vanished futures. Together, they feel like they’re mourning something - perhaps the sonic certainties of the past. Or maybe just Peter Rehberg, whose absence looms over this work like an afterimage.

But don’t let the ambient textures fool you - this is not music for spas or sleep playlists. It’s for those who know how to listen sideways, through the cracks, with ears tuned to decay and reverb and the ghosts of overtones. The tension isn’t in crescendos, but in what is withheld, smeared, stretched until it becomes immaterial. O’Malley doesn’t build up to a climax; he just slowly erodes your expectations until all that remains is a kind of distilled awe.

"But remember what you have had" is not nostalgic, but it is memory-soaked. A lament, a mantra, a palindrome of tone and timbre. It doesn’t mourn the past - it reanimates it as texture. It doesn’t tell you how to feel, but it quietly insists that you pay attention. And in a world that increasingly rewards the instant and the disposable, O’Malley has offered a work that demands - gently, ruthlessly - that you stay.

In the end, it’s a record about presence, about sonic space as sacred space. It is, perhaps, less about remembering what we had and more about relearning how to have - a moment, a sound, a breath. And that, in O’Malley’s hands, feels like a radical act.

Comments


Stream

«« »»